MoneyGram hits back at consumers and investors
MoneyGram has hit back at consumers calling the service “expensive” and “exclusive”, saying it’s not “a start-up who can live off investor money” and admitting its fraudulent detection is not “black and white”, leaving room for “false-positives”.
Chief of global operations, Kamila Chytil, tells FinTech Futures: “We can’t make everybody happy. We’re not a start-up that can process things for 99 cents and live off investor money. We do actually have to have a margin.”
When asked about how the company discerns between nefarious and genuine family transactions, Chytil says: “Nothing is black and white. It’s certainly not 100%. There are false-positives that we haven’t been able to do anything with.”
Moneygram helps families who send money across borders. The company admits to suspecting a pattern of “fraudulence if someone is receiving money from multiple people” but realises “it can also be family remittance.” Chytil says Moneygram is “continuously reviewing” its rules and has “relaxed” its rules since they were first put in place.
The money transfer giant also responded to investor commentary which advised the industry against investing in the company after a revenue plunge of $200 million.
Chytil says: “When we deliberately cut off $200 million in revenue which we dub as high-risk revenue, investors saw it as though we were shrinking. Honestly, I don’t know if they are connecting the dots. We were the first company to require ID which showed us who our customers were. It revealed fraudulent and nefarious patterns, so MoneyGram purposefully decided not to participate in it.”
MoneyGram claims to have reduced prices by 2/3 in some digital markets, “making it up on volume” instead which Chytil says is the “new strategy for digital growth”, especially in competitive markets such as the UK.
The company has also “been very aggressively changing” its technology, uprooting legacy API systems and replacing it with AWS and Google Cloud infrastructure. With Chytil at its head, the global operations chief wants to change MoneyGram’s mentality towards technology.
It’s no longer just blue-collar employees who are sending money back, she says. The newest wave of immigrants are also very digitally literate, which is why MoneyGram has outsourced to a developer to create 24 apps for different countries in the past 18 months.
As for MoneyGram’s cash business, Chytil admits it has a “stigma”, but says: “Cash is still very relevant, contrary to reports 10-15 years ago, so we continue to invest in that business also.”
When asked about how MoneyGram fares against competitors, Chytil says it’s “better than Zoom” but points out the unfair comparison with smaller services who are more agile. “We’re certainly a leader amongst the Western Unions and the Rias of the world.”
Looking forward, the company “want to service every company globally”. Currently it’s waiting for licences for large markets in Asia and is “very close” to securing a licence in New Zealand.
I wish to let u know that my monetary transactions are strictly family related in time of their needs providing I can afford it.At the time of helping ,I had just received a lump sum cash for on the job injuries and it was only then I was able to assist family members with a minimum of $500 .However that consideration was only for months of February, March and April.That trend was slowing down as I believe I have been able to offer the assistance then.Therafter I continue to send about $200 or $300 which was winding down when u no longer allowed me to help my relatives.Throughout the previous years i have been making small amounts a a available as the needs arisen but I kn for sure cause of having to held my 2 grandaughters,such generosity would have be greatly reduced even though relatives still make request for help.Hope consideration will be granted to continue to help
I used to send money to my family members but moneygram stopped me from sending because it was a country they dont like what they should relise is that there are some genuine people in these countrys they dont like so i will never send money through them again as they are just not a very nice company
I been blocked from sending money, did not get an answer why,it my hard earned money I send to people back home and mom in need need to know what I did wrong?